Featured Stories

Other Pamplin Media Group sites


Stafford residents need to oppose urbanization plan

Share
Adams: 'This is the kind of action that destroys public trust and undermines people's faith in government to act in the public good.'

If you, like the majority of your neighbors, are appalled by Metro's plan to increase Stafford's population by 50,000 (you read that right — 50,000), with all the traffic, habitat destruction and endless cycles of construction that it will bring, it is urgent that you make your objections known. Let your mayor and the Clackamas County Commissioners know that you support the Stafford Hamlet Compromise (more on that below) and oppose Metro's "high density" plan for our community. We have made it easy for you to do — just go to StaffordHamlet.com and sign the petition today.

In his inauguration speech, newly elected Clackamas County Commission Chair Jim Bernard said one of his top priorities was to "rebuild trust with three of our cities, a hamlet, and Metro, and let them know Clackamas County will work with them to arrive at an agreement that will give them control over the future of Stafford." Unfortunately one of his first actions was to support Metro and land speculators and throw Lake Oswego, West Linn, Tualatin and Stafford Hamlet under Metro's "high density" bus.

Adding insult to injury, the County Commission took this action unilaterally, without consulting the jurisdictions or residents that will be so profoundly impacted by this ill-advised decision. This is the kind of action that destroys public trust and undermines people's faith in government to act in the public good.

The cities of Lake Oswego, West Linn, Tualatin and the majority of Stafford Hamlet landowners have been resisting Metro's efforts to urbanize Stafford for 25 years.

Some of numerous reasons for this opposition include:

• Astronomical cost. Providing urban services (sewers, water, roads, etc.) alone has been estimated to cost $1 billion — yes, billion with a B — of taxpayer dollars. Then there is the cost for providing new schools, fire stations and other urban services.

• Increased traffic congestion. Studies of the area confirm the topography of this region prohibits practical and economical solutions to the vastly increased traffic that high density development would bring.

• Destruction of the areas rural legacy, and with that the quality of life we in this region have all invested in. Implementing Metro's density requirement of 15 homes per acre will inevitably destroy the rural character of this area and eliminate the buffer it provides to residents of surrounding areas. The projected increase of 50,000 people in the area is more than the population of either Lake Oswego or West Linn.

The urban reserve designation ignores the criteria-driven recommendation of the Clackamas County Urban/Rural Reserves Project. A two-year countywide study completed in 2009, this advisory committee concluded that only the Borland area met Metros own "factors" for urbanization. The committee concluded the area north of the Tualatin River (the Stafford Triangle) did not meet the urban "factors" and should remain undesignated.

In 2010, Metro put Stafford in the urban reserve. West Linn and Tualatin appealed that decision. In 2014, the Oregon Court of Appeals remanded this decision back to the County and, as I write this, Metro and the Clackamas County Board of Commissioners are conspiring to throw us back into the urban reserve again.

What you can do: sign the petition at www.StaffordHamlet.com to tell Metro and the Clackamas County Commissioners that we have a much better plan for Stafford's future.

David Adams is a Stafford resident.